Punk is an attitude. That is the old refrain. Despite what
outsiders might think, punk isn’t a clothing style or any definite
way of playing music. It isn’t an ideology or a set of beliefs.
Punk is loud, aggressive, raucous, in your face, and, most
importantly, sincere. The attitude isn’t limited to music,
appearance, or the counter cultural underground music scene. It can
extend into any aspect of life. Even writing. And possibly no other
writer embodied the punk attitude in the written word the way Lester
Bangs did during the short 33 years of his life. Live fast, die
young. Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung is
an anthology of his writings assembled to preserve his energetic
raging-bull prose for future generations who probably need a wake up
kick in the shins these days since it appears counter culture, and
American culture along with it, is sleepwalking into oblivion.
Lester
Bangs is most famous for his rock journalism, criticism, and record
and concert reviews most
notably
written for Rolling Stone, Creem, and
the Village Voice back
in the 1970s. He may have been the man who coined the term “punk”
since he presciently
saw a connecting thread between the garage bands of the 1960s, the
Velvet Underground, glam rock, the proto-punk scene in Detroit, and
the expanding punk scene in New York City from the mid-1970s and
beyond. He championed The
Velvet Underground, The Stooges, and The Dictators when most people
were unwilling to tolerate them. He was one of the first critics to
point out that rock and roll is all about feeling and raw emotion
more than technical perfection. He was also one of the first critics
to call out rock stars for being what they mostly are: spoiled,
petulant little children whose monster sized egos are nothing but a
smokescreen to hide their human shortcomings from public view. “All
rock stars are assholes,” said rock promoter Danny Fields. Lester
Bangs took that simple idea and ran with it.
The
opening articles start in the late 1960s, covering garage bands like
The Count Five and Question Mark and The Mysterians, the meaning and
significance of the first two Stooges albums, and why Ray Dennis
Stekler’s trashy cult classic psychedelic zombie musical film,
The Incredibly Strange Creatures that Stopped Living and
Became Mixed Up Zombies,
is a great work of art. But
early on, it is easy to see that Bangs’ writing is about so much
more than the stated subject matters.
He rarely ever stays on topic, going off on long tangents about sex
and drugs while violating standard rules of punctuation and sentence
length. He often writes like Arthur Rimbaud after popping a handful
of uppers. If psychosis and French Symbolist poetry ever found
an appropriate place to liaise with rock journalism it is in the
prose of Lester Bangs. Reading this stuff is like being hit in the
face with a firehose while riding a bull in a rodeo, not that I would
actually know what that feels like. (I did ride a mechanical bull
once in a place where there was an Asian woman wearing a fringed
leather bikini and shiny knee-high boots wielding a horse whip in her
hand. Needless to say, I didn’t last long on the mechanical bull.
And now I think I understand
what the song “Rawhide” is really about.)
But somehow the fast paced insanity of the writing works even if it
can be a little exhausting to keep up with at times.
This
collection moves on into various articles written for Rolling
Stone and Creem in
the early 70s. The acts covered range widely from the likes
of James Taylor
and Barry White to Jethro Tull, Slade, The J. Geils Band, David
Bowie, and Kraftwerk. Some of these are favorable and some aren’t.
Lester Bangs takes interest in whoever he writes about even when he
has no interest in them. His reviews of James Taylor are obviously
sarcastic, character assassination pieces while he expresses
fascination for Jethro Tull even though he hates their music. The
chapter on David Bowie is a little more complex as he considers
himself a Bowie fan but can’t stand the man as a performer. The
Slade and J. Geils articles are interesting since Slade starts a food
fight in Trader Vic’s (yes, that’s the original tiki bar that
eventually turned into the Trader Joe’s grocery store chain) and
then harasses
a dinner party for Freemasons. The J. Geils Band invite Bangs onstage
to type an article during a concert for reasons you will have to read
on your own. Lester Bangs really captures the atmosphere of free for
all fun that was a part of rock concerts back in those days,
something that sadly no longer exists in our dismal music industry
now.
There
are a couple important things to notice in these writings. One is
that Bangs frequently
refers to a certain class of rock stars as punks. This was a few
years before “punk” became an officially designated genre of
music. But Bangs wasn’t describing the music. He
was describing the obnoxious behavior of people like the MC5 and Iggy
Pop. It looks almost obvious that he was instrumental in that words
being used to describe the genre. There is some debate over whether
it was Bruce Springsteen or Legs McNeil who started using “punk”
as a name for the musical style and scene that grew with it.
The
other important thing to notice is that these articles are thoroughly
unpredictable. You can never
tell where they will end up. In example, a review of a
John Coltrane album turns
into a story about Lester Bangs using screeching, atonal blasts from
a saxophone to terrorize his landlady after she complains about him
making too much noise. Other than the presence of the saxophone, what
does this have to do with the Coltrane album? Who Knows? Who cares?
It’s great writing.
The
genius of Lester Bangs really shines through in the section on Lou
Reed. The two men had a curious relationship. Bangs became famous in
New York City for the interviews he did with Reed for the Village
Voice. As we see here, they
weren’t actual interviews, but more like drunken arguments over
nothing important other than one-upmanship in a gladiatorial battle
of nastiness. Both Bangs and Reed would later say that these
argument/interviews were the best punk journalism ever written. Both
of them were in firm agreement on one other thing too: they both
thought that Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music is
one of the greatest rock albums ever recorded. In one interview, Reed
goes on about how it is a multi-layered symphonic work of avant-garde
classical composition. Lester Bangs retorts by saying that Reed only
thinks so because he was on amphetamines when he recorded it. In any
case, Bangs also waxes poetic about how beautiful its
four sides of vinyl containing nothing but droning guitar feedback
played through high-end studio equipment are.
It is a masterpiece because
most people find it impossible to listen to. One thing about Lester
Bangs is
that he appreciated the noisier, abrasive side of rock and roll more
than the finer examples of musicianship that the mainstream goes for.
He liked his music a lot more if he knew it would irritate people to
the point of anger. I bet he
would have loved the Butthole Surfers. I
bet he would have hated grunge too.
After
the Lou Reed section, we get a variety of articles with an even wider
range of topics than came previously. They mostly start as album or
concert reviews, but there is
also one long-form work of
journalism about The Clash. We get insights into all kinds of things
like the direction the music industry is heading in the late 1970s,
the crass and offensive attitudes of rock’s biggest stars, social
observations, critiques of the American lifestyle, and
Lester Bangs’ inner torments in dealing with disillusionment,
anxiety, depression, insecurity, inadequacy,
and drug addiction. This fits
harmoniously with an article about Iggy Pop and the underlying
negativity of the punk scene in general. In a previous article
written
about Iggy Pop, he examines
how The Stooges embody authenticity in rock music, more so than most
other bands. Here he poses the question as to why Iggy Pop is so
self-abusive when performing
on stage. He drunkenly rolls around in broken glass, cuts his body
with razors, and starts a fight with a bar-full of bikers, taunting
them with insults and throwing beer bottles at them until he gets
beaten close to death. Bangs observes that in the beginning The
Stooges reckless abandonment and Iggy Pop’s indulgence in
nihilistic self-destruction was ecstatic and liberating, but
over time it became more obvious that this freedom from restraint is
motivated by a deep sense of self-hatred on Iggy Pop’s part. Bangs
also sees this self-hatred as being an underlying attitude of the New
York and British punk scenes. If this were so, you might wonder why
Iggy Pop never just outright committed suicide (he’s still alive
and well today). But there must be something to what Bangs has said
considering Pop’s antics. It may not be entirely about self-hatred,
but it certainly isn’t self-love either. A singer who brings
himself to the edge of death in every performance is not a role model
of healthy self-respect. The
guy obviously has problems, but the mind of Iggy Pop remains a
mystery.
In
the latter articles of this collection, you can see Lester Bangs
maturing both in writing style and psychologically. He becomes more
socially responsible. In what is possible his most famous work of
journalism, “The White Noise Supremacists”, he admits to feeling
guilty for having used racist language in the past and examines
racism in the punk scene despite the presence of African-Americans,
Latinos, Asians, and everything else. When interviewing people at
CBGB’s about the subject, one punk dismisses
the problem because racism is
just as much a part of their scene as anywhere else. Bangs’
comeback is that punks are supposed to be different from everybody
else. He
ends the article with a plea for punks to stop being racist. He
is met with a lukewarm response and his disillusionment with America
continues to grow.
And
then it goes onwards to the U.K. where he tours with The Clash. He
finds them to be likable and unpretentious, thinking he finally found
a bunch of rock stars who weren’t assholes, but as events on the
tour unfold, he becomes disillusioned with them too. There is a
progressively creeping
sense of despair as Lester Bangs wrote into the early 1980s before he
died of a drug overdose while he had the flu.
What
is great about these writings is that Lester Bangs transcends his
genre. That may be an odd statement considering that the genre is
rock journalism, one
that doesn’t lend itself easily
to the concept of transcendence to begin with. But this is an author
who put so much of himself into what he wrote. He wasn’t just
writing to make a living or
even just for attention. He
was writing to make art and in that he succeeded. Of course, this
book is only a sample of what is probably his best work. Not
everything about it is great though. There is a fair amount of
casually racist language that would have been common in his time, but
dates the writing significantly. To be fair, he doesn’t express any
ideas about other races that are meant to be insulting or hateful;
it’s just that he uses words that are now
considered racially offensive
in place of terms like “African-American” or “Asian”.
By the end of the book, his
writing becomes a little tiring too. His long sentences and tortured
syntax combines with his moodiness and indulgence in pessimism begin
to drag his writing down to the point where you get fatigued from
reading it. Otherwise, I’d
be interested in the articles that weren’t included here.
Lester Bangs was one of the first, if not THE first, to recognize the
genius of Lemmy Kilmister and the greatest of punk-metal crossover
bands Motorhead. I would love to see what he wrote about them.
Psychotic
Reactions and Carburetor Dung is
so much more than a collection of articles or a nostalgia trip for
aging counter-culturalists. It is a collection of writings marked by
energy, passion, authenticity and enough volume
(the amp is tuned up to 11) to
speak across multiple generations. On the surface, these passages are
rough while being true to the punk
attitude in their inner core.
The old punk
clothing style
could include leather, spikes, razors, chains, dog collars, combat
boots, safety pins through the nose, and self-inflicted wounds while
your typical punk, beneath it
all, was good natured,
humorous, ironic, articulate, intelligent, complex, affectionate,
righteously angry, socially
aware, and even a bit sensitive. Those later traits are all inherent
parts of Lester Bangs’ writing while the former ornamentation is
the sharp edges of his language that breaks all rules of good writing
and works better than what most teachers would consider to be
acceptable
by educational standards. Regardless of what you think of Lester
Bangs’ ever changing world view, these writing should serve as a
boost of rocket fuel for the increasingly dull and shallow society we
have in America today. The upcoming generations need writing like
this to inspire them with the fires of rebellion. Stop
acting like a bunch of old ladies. Smash your
mind-rotting cell phones and make some noise. It’s
time again for some cage
rattling and earth shaking. Let’s make life exciting once again.